Legal Advice in Minutes
❤️ Click here: Free online lawyer chat room
Continue staying in the country and my status would be active from September 1. Furthermore, a malpractice attorney, or a California personal injury attorney that specializes in medical malpractice can prepare a power of attorney, like other attorneys can draft online or provide free legal help with a power of attorney form.
See New York City Ethics Op. Do I need a seller's permit to sell wholesale? They also asked the clerk if she did it, where are all of the cigarettes? I had a lawyer who asked me if he could work for the insurance company I had him working for me.
Live Chat - Some of these photographs may be subject to copyright violation. Which type of entity should I be filing?
To avoid formation of attorney-client relationships through such chat room conversations, lawyers should avoid giving specific legal advice. If a lawyer subject to the D. Rules of Professional Conduct engages in chat room communications of sufficient particularity and specificity to give rise to an attorney-client relationship under the substantive law of a state with jurisdiction to regulate the communication, that lawyer must comply with the full array of D. Rules governing attorney-client relationships. Prior to drafting this opinion, one committee member undertook an informal survey of web sites offering chat rooms on law-related topics. Many provided a multitude of law-related services, including not only live attorney chat rooms, but also attorney directories, treatises and legal reports, and links to other law-related information sources. Participating in this chat room does not establish an attorney client relationship—for personal legal advice consult your attorney. Most chat room services we visited further disclaimed any duty to keep information provided by participants confidential, though one, devoted to immigration law, promised to make its best efforts to protect from third parties information transmitted by participants. Nevertheless, we did read various conversations taking place in chat rooms that were open to the public without charge. I have been told by an abusive husband not to return. This is the only place I have a home!!!!!! Based upon the statements you made, it appears that you are in-status and your visa expires on September 8, 2001. It is difficult to change status from the visa waiver. You will probably be required to leave the United States to obtain it. If you have no interest in education you might want to apply for a nonimmigrant work visa. Without knowing more about your background, I do not know if you are eligible for any work visas…. If you know of a specific visa for which you want to apply. Or if you would like to discuss this with me. I offer a 10 minute free telephone consultation. XXX-XXX-XXXX is my direct line. As we recently observed in Opinion 302, however, the D. Essentially the same prescriptions as those we outlined in Opinion 302 apply to attorney communications in chat rooms or similar services, including that the communications must be accurate, lawyers may not imply that they are disinterested in particular matters when they are not, lawyers must disclose any fees they pay in order to participate, and such fees may not be linked to or contingent on the amount of legal fees the lawyer may obtain from clients obtained through online services. Instead, under our Rules we think it best to regard chat room communications as having some qualities that are similar to in-person communications and some that are different. Lawyers communicating about their services in chat rooms therefore must take care not to run afoul of D. Consistent with our mandate, we here consider the applicability of the D. Rules of Professional Conduct do not contain a provision equivalent to EC 2-2, there is every reason to believe, consistent with the traditions of the profession, that these ethical duties to contribute to making legal information available to the public continue to hold strong here. On the other hand, the ethical impetus that motivates lawyers to help the public become aware of legal problems cannot insulate lawyers from the consequences arising from formation of an attorney-client relationship as the result of providing legal advice. The question of precisely what conduct gives rise to an attorney-client relationship is one of substantive law in the relevant jurisdiction s. Because the issue under discussion turns on that question, a review of the basic principles concerning the formation of attorney-client relationships is in order here. Most courts agree, for example, that neither a retainer nor a formal agreement is required to establish an attorney-client relationship. Many courts look to the reasonable expectations and reliance of the putative client. Under this approach, even casually rendered advice may be found to give rise to an attorney-client relationship where the putative client relies on it. In light of these general principles, lawyers seeking to avoid formation of attorney-client relationships through chat room conversations would be well advised to avoid providing legal advice in such communications. The relevant distinction is that between legal advice and legal information. Providing legal information involves discussion of legal principles, trends, and considerations—the kind of information one might give in a speech or newspaper article, for example. Legal ethics committees in jurisdictions where EC 2-2 is still in effect have advised precisely this approach. In New York City Ethics Op. Talks and writing by lawyers for non-lawyers should caution them not to attempt to solve individual problems upon the basis of the information contained therein. Likewise, in Ohio Sup. The fact that lawyers may now be providing the public with legal information through Internet communications rather than more traditional fora such as public lectures or talk shows does not alter this fundamental analysis. But lawyers should advise information seekers to obtain legal counsel to determine what law would be applicable to their unique circumstances. Likewise, lawyers participating in chat room exchanges could explain the approaches to certain legal problems lawyers typically consider, but should not purport to advise inquirers as to what to do in their specific situations. Where a communication is lengthy or otherwise might leave room for misunderstanding, lawyers should remind inquirers that the chat room communication is not a substitute for specific legal advice, and that the lawyer is providing general legal information only. To illustrate, we will use the example we gave above of one chat room conversation we encountered. Such persons, however, may often find it difficult to change status from a visa waiver. They might try to apply for a non-immigrant visa, such as a student visa, but they would probably be required to leave the United States to obtain such a visa. Another possibility some persons in this situation explore is to apply for a non-immigrant work visa. I cannot give you legal advice on your particular situation, but if you would like to discuss your specific case with me, you may call me for a consultation. The last question we address concerns the consequences under the D. In our view, if an attorney-client relationship is formed through cyberspace communications in which an inquirer seeks, and a lawyer provides, specific legal advice, that relationship brings to bear all of the responsibilities and benefits defined under the D. Nor may the lawyer restrict his or her obligations with respect to such matters as conflicts or confidentiality. Thus, before undertaking the kind of communication that would give rise to an attorney-client relationship as determined by applicable substantive law, the attorney must, in our view, ensure that the formation of that relationship does not give rise to impermissible conflicts under D. The attorney must also safeguard the secrets and confidences of that client under Rule 1. This may be true even if an attorney-client relationship has not formed but the lawyer is in a situation in which he or she properly should regard an advice seeker as a prospective client, as might be especially likely to arise in settings in which lawyers are permitted to solicit or follow up with chat room visitors. Accordingly, even if a communication begins as a public communication in a chat room or similar exchange service, the attorney may be required at some point to reserve his or her communications for the eyes of a particular advice seeker only. And the attorney must always take care in cyberspace, as in face-to-face communications, that information he or she receives through on-line communications does not end up creating conflict of interest problems with respect to existing clients. Likewise, the attorney must ensure that such requirements as that of competence under D. Advocates of the provision of low-cost legal advice through on-line chat rooms and similar innovative services make the important point that these services offer great potential for providing low-cost legal services to low and moderate income persons. We do not dispute this observation or the spirit of concern and experimentation with which it is made. In its proposed Model Rule of Professional Conduct 1. Rules of Professional Conduct currently in effect. Such reforms will have to await the attention of the D. As our rules currently stand, the full panoply of ethical considerations, including conflict avoidance, confidentiality, competence and the like, attach to all attorney-client relationships, including those that may be formed inadvertently through attorney communications with persons seeking legal information over the Internet. We also concluded in Opinion 302 that lawyers may use web sites that offer opportunities to bid competitively on legal projects posted by prospective clients, again provided the lawyers comply with all applicable rules of professional conduct. Another stated that the lawyers responding to questions in its chat rooms were employees on its staff. A-00-1 2000 ; Mich. Rules do not include provisions patterned after ABA Model Rules 7. Lanctot, supra note 12, at 248. See Lanctot, supra note 12, at 192-93 n. This is especially true for Internet communications, where giving legal advice might create an attorney-client relationship and thus subject an attorney to malpractice liability in a far distant jurisdiction. See New York City Ethics Op. This conclusion is consistent with that of another state bar ethics committee that has considered the issue. Conduct 96-10 following its prior opinion cautioning that attorneys who gave legal advice through a telephone service could easily run afoul of the conflict of interest provisions of Rules 1. A client may waive confidentiality under D. The best way of avoiding conflict problems, of course, would be to refrain from creation of an attorney-client relationship in the first place. Lawyers might also ask that chat room participants abstain from providing confidential information, as already discussed. These steps would not necessarily eliminate all conflicts problems, however, which again points to the need to eschew the formation of attorney-client relationships. Such a limitation, however, would not be reasonable if the time allotted was not sufficient to yield advice upon which the client could rely. Although an agreement for a limited representation does not exempt a lawyer from the duty to provide competent representation, the limitation is a factor to be considered when determining the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. Lawyer offers to provide tax-law advice for an hourly fee lower than most tax lawyers charge. Such a waiver is invalid, even if clients benefit to some extent from the low price and consent freely and on the basis of adequate information.
Free Chat Online
I may even try for other countries. Since I am alone I wanted accompaniment, so I searched online for a pet. The following weeks involved me mailing copies of my medical records and doctors notes to my unit, and never received a response back. Free is also called pro bono in legal parlance. I asked for the next training dates, and my squad leader said she would get back to me. Get free legal advice online.
